POST /v1/sites/{siteId}/wp-login

Hitelesítés

Küldjön egy API-kulcsot bearer tokenként. A kulcsnak rendelkeznie kell a(z) sites.wp_login jogosultsággal; az ezzel nem rendelkező kulcsok esetén a rendszer 403-as hibát ad vissza 404 helyett.

Ez a végpont nem fogad el szervezeti azonosítót. Az Ön kulcsa már azonosítja azt a szervezetet, amelyhez tartozik, és a válasz is erre vonatkozik.

Próbálja ki

Cserélje ki a hegyes zárójelek közötti részt a saját értékeivel, a kulcshelyőrzőt pedig a vezérlőpultján található kulccsal.

curl -X POST https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/sites/{siteId}/wp-login \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{  }'

Be van jelentkezve? A vezérlőpultban lévő API-konzol kitölti a valós szervezetazonosítóját és a saját kulcsát, és a kérést az éles API-n futtatja, hogy láthassa a tényleges választ. Nyissa meg ezt a végpontot az API konzolban

Részletek

Returns a short-lived, signed SSO token (and the URL that carries it) for one-click sign-in to the site's wp-admin (V1 parity). The customer's browser is sent to the URL; the Zinn® plugin on the site verifies the token, enforces single-use, and establishes the wp-admin session. The token is bound to this site, expires in ~2 minutes, and its issuance is audit-logged with the real actor. Requires sites.wp_login. Only WordPress/WooCommerce sites that are serving are eligible (422 / 409 otherwise); if one-click login is not configured on the platform the endpoint returns 503 and mints nothing. ⛔⛔ A 201 from this endpoint is a claim about the SITE, not merely about the signature, and it did not used to be. Minting is local, cheap and always succeeds; every reason a grant cannot work lives on the box. Before the preflight below existed this endpoint answered 201 with a correctly-signed URL for a site whose WordPress had no SSO key, no plugin to serve the route, and — measured on 2026-08-15 — was returning HTTP 500 to every request. Three such grants were issued and audit-logged in one day, each of which opened an error page. So before signing anything the endpoint now checks, and repairs what it can: the hosting platform can receive an SSO key at all — this platform exposes no shell and no wp-cli, so its sites can never honour one and are refused 422 (PLATFORM_CANNOT_SSO) rather than handed a token; the plugin that serves the route is installed and active — installed automatically if it is not, because a precondition the platform can satisfy itself is not one the customer should read about; * the site's ZINN_SSO_KEY is present on the box, asked of the file rather than of our own record of having written it — the two disagreed; * and the site actually answers HTTP without a server error, probed from the box against the origin so a CDN cache cannot report health the site no longer has. A site that fails this is 409 (SITE_NOT_REACHABLE). The error body's reason carries which of those failed, so a client can say the true thing instead of "something went wrong".

Paraméterek

Kérés törzse

Válasz

Hibák, amelyeket ez a végpont visszaadhattatlan

401 · 403 · 404 · 409 · 422 · 429 · 503