POST /v1/sites/{siteId}/wp-login

Pengesahan

Hantar kunci API sebagai token pembawa. Kunci tersebut mesti membawa kebenaran sites.wp_login; kunci yang tidak mempunyainya akan ditolak dengan 403, bukan 404.

Titik akhir ini tidak memerlukan id organisasi. Kunci anda telah mengenal pasti organisasi kepunyaannya, dan respons dis skopkan kepadanya.

Cuba

Gantikan apa sahaja di dalam kurungan sudut dengan nilai anda sendiri, dan pemegang tempat kunci dengan kunci dari papan pemuka anda.

curl -X POST https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/sites/{siteId}/wp-login \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{  }'

Sudah log masuk? Konsol API dalam papan pemuka anda mengisi id organisasi sebenar dan kunci anda sendiri, serta menjalankan permintaan terhadap API langsung supaya anda boleh melihat respons sebenar. Buka penamat ini dalam konsol API

Butiran

Returns a short-lived, signed SSO token (and the URL that carries it) for one-click sign-in to the site's `wp-admin` (V1 parity). The customer's browser is sent to the URL; the Zinn® plugin on the site verifies the token, enforces single-use, and establishes the wp-admin session. The token is bound to this site, expires in ~2 minutes, and its issuance is audit-logged with the real actor. Requires `sites.wp_login`. Only WordPress/WooCommerce sites that are **serving** are eligible (422 / 409 otherwise); if one-click login is not configured on the platform the endpoint returns 503 and mints nothing. ⛔⛔ **A `201` from this endpoint is a claim about the SITE, not merely about the signature, and it did not used to be.** Minting is local, cheap and always succeeds; every reason a grant cannot work lives on the box. Before the preflight below existed this endpoint answered `201` with a correctly-signed URL for a site whose WordPress had no SSO key, no plugin to serve the route, and — measured on 2026-08-15 — was returning **HTTP 500 to every request**. Three such grants were issued and audit-logged in one day, each of which opened an error page. So before signing anything the endpoint now checks, and repairs what it can: * the hosting platform can receive an SSO key at all — this platform exposes no shell and no wp-cli, so its sites can never honour one and are refused `422` (`PLATFORM_CANNOT_SSO`) rather than handed a token; * the plugin that serves the route is installed and active — **installed automatically if it is not**, because a precondition the platform can satisfy itself is not one the customer should read about; * the site's `ZINN_SSO_KEY` is present **on the box**, asked of the file rather than of our own record of having written it — the two disagreed; * and the site actually answers HTTP without a server error, probed from the box against the origin so a CDN cache cannot report health the site no longer has. A site that fails this is `409` (`SITE_NOT_REACHABLE`). The error body's `reason` carries which of those failed, so a client can say the true thing instead of "something went wrong".

Parameter

Badan permintaan

Respons

Ralat yang boleh dikembalikan oleh titik akhir ini

401 · 403 · 404 · 409 · 422 · 429 · 503