POST /v1/sites/{siteId}/plan

認証

ベアラー トークンとして API キーを送信します。キーには sites.view 権限が付与されている必要があります。権限のないキーは 404 ではなく 403 で拒否されます。

このエンドポイントは組織IDを受け付けません。お使いのキーによって所属する組織がすでに特定されており、レスポンスはその組織にスコープされます。

試してみる

アングルブラケット内のすべてをご自身の値に置き換え、キーのプレースホルダーをご利用中のダッシュボードのキーに置き換えてください。

curl -X POST https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/sites/{siteId}/plan \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{ "plan_version_id": <Uuid> }'

ログインしていますか？ダッシュボード内のAPIコンソールでは、実際の組織IDやお客様ご自身のキーが自動入力され、ライブAPIに対してリクエストが実行されるため、実際のレスポンスを確認することができます。 API コンソールでこのエンドポイントを開く

詳細

Charges the prorated difference, moves the vendor package to the new type, and moves the subscription — in that order, for the reasons the engine's plan-change module records. The response states what actually happened rather than what was asked for: `package_type` is read back from the vendor after the move, and `charged_minor` is what the gateway captured. ⛔ **`expected_total_minor` is a money guard, not a convenience.** It is the figure the customer was actually shown, and the change is refused `422` when the freshly-computed quote differs — a price that moved between the page rendering and the button being pressed (an FX recompute, a catalogue edit, the period rolling) must never be charged silently. It is optional only so a script may omit it deliberately. Every other refusal is `422` as well, with nothing charged and nothing changed: an incompatible package type, usage above what the smaller plan allows, a card decline. ⛔⛔ **Two usage refusals, checked in this order** (#2089). First, **this site's** vendor-live counts against the target package type — databases, FTP accounts, subdomains — so a customer is told about the thing they can fix on the screen in front of them. Then **the whole account** against the plan being applied: sites, mailboxes, mailbox storage and disk, anywhere in the org's subtree, from the same `check_downgrade` the staff tariff endpoint uses. Until #2089 this endpoint ran only the first of those and the staff endpoint only the second, so the owner's ruling held on the path he does not use and failed on the one his customers do. ⛔ **There is no override here.** The staff tariff endpoint has an audited `override_over_limit` because staff sometimes genuinely need to move an over-limit account; a customer overriding their own quota check is not an override, it is no check. A customer who cannot proceed must reduce usage or contact support. ⭐ `getSitePlanChoices` marks an unaffordable plan `blocked_reason: "account_over_limit"` **before** the button is pressed, so this refusal should be unreachable from the UI. It is still enforced here: the picker is an affordance, not the control. Serves **our own fleet as well as the managed shared range** (#2271). The money path is identical on both — prorate, order, charge, credit, supersede — and only the middle step differs: on managed hosting the vendor package moves to another template, on the fleet the box is told the plan's new disk and file allowances. ⛔ On the fleet that happens **after** the subscription is superseded, because the numbers to apply are read from the governing subscription; a failure there leaves the customer out of sync (their site's Storage card says the new allowance is still being applied) and never out of pocket. `404` for a site whose platform has no plan to change — a **VPS** or **cloud server** (the billed unit is the machine) or an **edge host** (no account at all) — or for a site that is not the caller's. Requires `sites.view` **and** `billing.payment.manage` — it charges a card, so the key that gates paying is the key that gates committing to a payment.

パラメータ

リクエスト本文

返信

このエンドポイントが返すエラー

401 · 403 · 404 · 422 · 429 · 503