POST /v1/sites/{siteId}/ide-assist

المصادقة

هذه نقطة النهاية عامة. فهي لا تتطلب أي بيانات اعتماد ولا أي مؤسسة - بل هي ما تقرؤه مواقعنا التسويقية ومحركات الإجابة بالذكاء الاصطناعي الخاصة بنا.

لا يقبل هذا الطرف أي معرف للمؤسسة. يحدد مفتاحك بالفعل المؤسسة التي ينتمي إليها، وتكون الاستجابة محصورة في نطاقها.

جربه الآن

استبدل أي شيء بين أقواس زاوية بقيمك الخاصة، والعنصر النائب للمفتاح بمفتاح من لوحة تحكمك.

curl -X POST https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/sites/{siteId}/ide-assist \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{ "context": <string> }'

هل سجلت الدخول؟ تقوم وحدة تحكم واجهة برمجة التطبيقات في لوحة التحكم الخاصة بك بربط معرف مؤسستك الحقيقي ومفتاحك الخاص، وتنفذ الطلب مقابل واجهة برمجة التطبيقات المباشرة لتتمكن من رؤية الاستجابة الفعلية. افتح هذه النهاية الطرفية في وحدة تحكم API

التفاصيل

Answers one request about one file, from inside the site's browser editor, and bills the model call to that site's organisation on the same AI meter as every other surface (their own provider key if they have added one, their Zinn® credit if not). **This is the one site endpoint family with no user session behind it, and that is deliberate.** Its caller is a VS Code extension running inside the customer's own CageFS jail on a hosting box, which cannot hold a Keycloak session. It authenticates with a **signed, site-bound, expiring grant** minted when the editor is opened and presented as `Authorization: Bearer <grant>`. The grant names the site, the organisation and the person who opened the editor; the site in it must match the site in the path, and the organisation is read from the grant and never from the request body, so a grant for one site can neither ask about another nor bill another tenant. The grant never reaches the customer's browser: it is held in a root-owned file on the hosting box and attached by the editor gate, which runs outside every jail. A missing or unreadable grant is a `404`, never a `401`, so this cannot be used to discover that a site exists. An **editing** action (`fix`, `refactor`, `complete`, `generate`) returns a `proposal`: the complete replacement for the region that was sent. It is a suggestion and nothing on this side applies it — the editor shows it as a diff and writes it only after the customer approves. A **read-only** action (`ask`, `explain`) never returns one, however code-shaped its answer. A refusal the customer should read — an exhausted allowance, a revoked provider key, a question that is too long, a file too large to rewrite safely — is a `422` carrying the sentence to show them and a code in `details[].code`, because "you are out of credit" and "we could not reach the model" are different facts and only one of them is theirs to fix.

المعلمات

جسم الطلب

الاستجابة

الأخطاء التي يمكن أن تُرجعها نقطة النهاية هذه

404 · 422 · 429