connections

POST /v1/connections/{provider}/{connectionId}/probe

Re-test a stored credential, one row per permission.

Sve connections krajnje tačke

Autentifikacija

Pošaljite API ključ kao bearer token. Ključ mora imati dozvolu connections.manage; ključ bez nje se odbija sa 403, a ne sa 404.

Ovaj krajnji tačka ne prihvata ID organizacije. Vaš ključ već identifikuje organizaciju kojoj pripada, a odgovor je ograničen na nju.

Isprobajte

Zamenite bilo šta u uglastim zagradama sopstvenim vrednostima, a ključni placeholder sa ključem sa vaše kontrolne table.

curl -X POST https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/connections/{provider}/{connectionId}/probe \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{  }'

Prijavljeni ste? API konzola na vašoj kontrolnoj tabli automatski popunjava ID vaše stvarne organizacije i vaš sopstveni ključ, i izvršava zahtev nad API-jem uživo tako da možete videti stvarni odgovor. Otvorite ovu krajnju tačku u API konzoli

Detalji

Exercises every permission we need **against the provider** using the credential already stored for this connection, and returns one row per permission. This is the "retest" half of add-and-test: the customer's fix happens in their vendor's console — they tick the missing permission at Cloudflare — so there is nothing to re-paste and the stored credential is used. ⛔ It does not ask the credential to describe itself. A least-privilege token cannot enumerate its own permissions, which is how a token missing DNS edit entirely came to be displayed as "works, we will check on first use". Every check here is a real, well-formed call, and a write permission is proved by writing — a throwaway DNS record created and immediately deleted, or a zone setting written back to the value just read. Each row is `pass`, `fail` or **`unknown`**, and the third is not a nicety: `unknown` is the honest answer when we could not reach the question — no zone on the account yet, the vendor rate-limiting us, or a well-formed request refused on its content. ⛔ A client that renders `unknown` as a tick has reintroduced the defect this endpoint exists to remove. The result is stored against the connection with the time it was taken, and returned with `checked_at`. It is a **measurement, not a state** — the customer can revoke a permission at their vendor a second later and nothing here will know — so any surface showing it must show its age. Requires `connections.manage`.

Parametri

NazivVrstaObaveznoŠta je ovo
provider (path)ConnectionProviderDaThe third-party provider whose connections are addressed.
connectionId (path)UuidDaThe MCP connection's id.

Telo zahteva

NazivVrstaObaveznoŠta je ovo
zone_hintstringNeThe domain to test the zone-scoped permissions against. Optional — see `ConnectTokenRequest.zone_hint`.

Odgovor

NazivVrstaObaveznoŠta je ovo
credential_validbooleanDaA statement about the **credential**, not about the permissions. `false` means the provider rejected it outright, in which case the rows are not meaningful and the screen must s…
usablebooleanDaWhether we may store and use this credential: alive, with no **proved** absence of anything required. ⛔ Deliberately not "every row passed" — a brand-new account with no zone on…
checksPermissionCheck[]DaOne row per permission, in a stable catalogue order rather than the order the checks happened to finish in — a checklist whose rows reshuffle between two retests looks broken to…
missingstring[]DaRequired permissions the provider **proved** are absent. Not the unknowns.
unverifiedstring[]DaPermissions we could not determine either way. The honest amber set.
account_refstringDaThe account or zone the provider reported — discovered, never assumed.
detailstringDaAn overall explanation, used mainly for a rejected credential.
checked_atobjectDaWhen this was taken. ⛔ Never render the report without it: a checklist with no date on it is indistinguishable from a live one and will be read as live, when in fact the custome…

Greške koje ovaj krajnji tačka može da vrati

401 · 403 · 404 · 422 · 429 · 503