POST /v1/sites/{siteId}/wp-login

Autentifikacija

Pošaljite API ključ kao bearer token. Ključ mora imati dozvolu sites.wp_login; ključ bez nje se odbija sa 403, a ne sa 404.

Ovaj krajnji tačka ne prihvata ID organizacije. Vaš ključ već identifikuje organizaciju kojoj pripada, a odgovor je ograničen na nju.

Isprobajte

Zamenite bilo šta u uglastim zagradama sopstvenim vrednostima, a ključni placeholder sa ključem sa vaše kontrolne table.

curl -X POST https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/sites/{siteId}/wp-login \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{  }'

Prijavljeni ste? API konzola na vašoj kontrolnoj tabli automatski popunjava ID vaše stvarne organizacije i vaš sopstveni ključ, i izvršava zahtev nad API-jem uživo tako da možete videti stvarni odgovor. Otvorite ovu krajnju tačku u API konzoli

Detalji

Returns a short-lived, signed SSO token (and the URL that carries it) for one-click sign-in to the site's `wp-admin` (V1 parity). The customer's browser is sent to the URL; the Zinn® plugin on the site verifies the token, enforces single-use, and establishes the wp-admin session. The token is bound to this site, expires in ~2 minutes, and its issuance is audit-logged with the real actor. Requires `sites.wp_login`. Only WordPress/WooCommerce sites that are **serving** are eligible (422 / 409 otherwise); if one-click login is not configured on the platform the endpoint returns 503 and mints nothing. ⛔⛔ **A `201` from this endpoint is a claim about the SITE, not merely about the signature, and it did not used to be.** Minting is local, cheap and always succeeds; every reason a grant cannot work lives on the box. Before the preflight below existed this endpoint answered `201` with a correctly-signed URL for a site whose WordPress had no SSO key, no plugin to serve the route, and — measured on 2026-08-15 — was returning **HTTP 500 to every request**. Three such grants were issued and audit-logged in one day, each of which opened an error page. So before signing anything the endpoint now checks, and repairs what it can: * the hosting platform can receive an SSO key at all — this platform exposes no shell and no wp-cli, so its sites can never honour one and are refused `422` (`PLATFORM_CANNOT_SSO`) rather than handed a token; * the plugin that serves the route is installed and active — **installed automatically if it is not**, because a precondition the platform can satisfy itself is not one the customer should read about; * the site's `ZINN_SSO_KEY` is present **on the box**, asked of the file rather than of our own record of having written it — the two disagreed; * and the site actually answers HTTP without a server error, probed from the box against the origin so a CDN cache cannot report health the site no longer has. A site that fails this is `409` (`SITE_NOT_REACHABLE`). The error body's `reason` carries which of those failed, so a client can say the true thing instead of "something went wrong".

Parametri

Telo zahteva

Odgovor

Greške koje ovaj krajnji tačka može da vrati

401 · 403 · 404 · 409 · 422 · 429 · 503