hosting
GET /v1/sites/{siteId}/certificate
The TLS certificate serving this site.
Санҷиши ҳаққоният
Kalitи API-ро ҳамчун token-и bearer фиристед. Ин нуқтаи ниҳоӣ дар мушаххасот иҷозати мушаххасеро нишон намедиҳад, бинобар ин ба калиди худ ҳадди ақали заруриро диҳед ва ба ҷои тахмин кардан, ҷавобро санҷед.
Ин нуқтаи поёнӣ ягон рақами мушаххаси созмонро талаб намекунад. Калиди шумо аллакай созмонеро, ки ба он тааллуқ дорад, муайян мекунад ва ҷавоб ба он маҳдуд карда мешавад.
Санҷидан
Ҳар чизро дар қаavски кунҷӣ бо қиматҳои худ ва ҷойи нигоҳдорандаи калидро бо калима аз панели идоракунии худ иваз кунед.
curl -X GET https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/sites/{siteId}/certificate \
-H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…"Воarid шудаед? Консоли API дар панели идоракунии шумо рақами мушаххаси ташкилоти воқеӣ ва калиди худро пур мекунад ва дархостро бар зидди API-и фаъол иҷро мекунад, то шумо посухи воқеиро бубинед. Ин нуқтаи ниҳоиро дар консоли API кушоед
Тафсилот
Whether this site is served over HTTPS on its own name, and if not, why not. Sites on our own fleet are served a per-vhost certificate the platform obtains itself by ACME (owner ruling 2026-09-07, docs/537), because not every site sits behind a CDN and a site with DNS pointed straight at our fleet needs a publicly-trusted certificate of its own. ⛔ state is never simply "no". issued / pending / failed with a reason are three different facts, and the failure directions are asymmetric: behind Cloudflare Full (strict) an uncovered host answers HTTP 526 — a hard outage — while behind plain Full it is a silent downgrade. A payload that could only say "no" would leave a customer looking at a broken site with no explanation. ⛔ covered and serving are DIFFERENT and both are returned. covered means a CA signed it; serving means the box actually presents it. A certificate that exists and is not installed serves nobody, and a screen built from covered alone would report a healthy site to a customer whose visitors see a name-mismatch warning. scope is shared when the site is covered by one platform certificate for a registrable domain we own — the ordinary case for a preview hostname, where a single wildcard covers every site on that domain rather than one certificate each.
Параметрҳо
| Ном | Намуд | Талаб карда мешавад | Ин чӣ аст |
|---|---|---|---|
siteId (path) | Uuid | Бале | Site ID (UUIDv7). |
Ҷавоб
| Ном | Намуд | Талаб карда мешавад | Ин чӣ аст |
|---|---|---|---|
site_id | string | Бале | — |
state | string<none, pending, issued, failed, retired> | Бале | ⛔ none means nothing has been attempted, which is a DIFFERENT fact from failed. Collapsing them would leave a screen unable to tell a new site from a broken one. |
scope | string<site, shared> | Бале | shared when one platform certificate for a registrable domain we own covers this site — the ordinary case for a preview hostname. |
shared_suffix | string | Не | The registrable domain a shared certificate covers. Empty when scope is site. |
hostnames | string[] | Бале | Read back off the ISSUED artefact, never from what was requested — a CA that trimmed a name must not be reported as covering it. |
covered | boolean | Бале | A certificate authority has signed a certificate for this site. |
serving | boolean | Бале | ⛔ The box actually presents it. DIFFERENT from covered: a certificate that exists in Vault and is not installed serves nobody. |
failure_reason | string | Не | — |
failure_detail | string | Не | — |
not_after | string | Не | — |
installed_at | string | Не | — |
environment | string | Не | ⛔ Travels because a staging certificate is trusted by NO browser. A screen showing one as simply "issued" would report green for a site every visitor sees a warning on. |
wildcard_covered | boolean | Не | Whether subdomains are covered. A wildcard needs DNS-01, which needs a TXT record in the zone, so a domain whose DNS we do not manage cannot have one. |
Хатоҳое, ки ин нуқтаи ниҳоӣ метавонад баргардонад
401 · 403 · 404