POST /v1/sites/{siteId}/ide-assist

Tabbatar da Asali

Wannan yankin ƙarshen jama'a ne. Ba ya ɗaukar wata takardar shaida ko ƙungiya — shi ne abin da shafin kasuwancinmu da injunan amsa na AI ke karantawa.

Wannan wurin ƙarewa ba ya buƙatar ID na ƙungiya. Maɓallin ku ya riga ya gano ƙungiyar da yake ciki, kuma an iyakance amsa a kanta.

Gwada

May gurbin komai da ke cikin kusurwa da ƙimar ka, kuma may gurbin maballi da maballi daga allon sarrafa ka.

curl -X POST https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/sites/{siteId}/ide-assist \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{ "context": <string> }'

An shiga? Na'urar sarrafa API da ke cikin sashin kulawarka tana cika ainihin lambar ƙungiyarka da maɓallinka naka, sannan tana gudanar da buƙatar a kan ainihin API don haka zaka iya ganin amsar gaske. Buɗe wannan tashar a cikin na'urar kula da API

Bayani

Answers one request about one file, from inside the site's browser editor, and bills the model call to that site's organisation on the same AI meter as every other surface (their own provider key if they have added one, their Zinn® credit if not). **This is the one site endpoint family with no user session behind it, and that is deliberate.** Its caller is a VS Code extension running inside the customer's own CageFS jail on a hosting box, which cannot hold a Keycloak session. It authenticates with a **signed, site-bound, expiring grant** minted when the editor is opened and presented as `Authorization: Bearer <grant>`. The grant names the site, the organisation and the person who opened the editor; the site in it must match the site in the path, and the organisation is read from the grant and never from the request body, so a grant for one site can neither ask about another nor bill another tenant. The grant never reaches the customer's browser: it is held in a root-owned file on the hosting box and attached by the editor gate, which runs outside every jail. A missing or unreadable grant is a `404`, never a `401`, so this cannot be used to discover that a site exists. An **editing** action (`fix`, `refactor`, `complete`, `generate`) returns a `proposal`: the complete replacement for the region that was sent. It is a suggestion and nothing on this side applies it — the editor shows it as a diff and writes it only after the customer approves. A **read-only** action (`ask`, `explain`) never returns one, however code-shaped its answer. A refusal the customer should read — an exhausted allowance, a revoked provider key, a question that is too long, a file too large to rewrite safely — is a `422` carrying the sentence to show them and a code in `details[].code`, because "you are out of credit" and "we could not reach the model" are different facts and only one of them is theirs to fix.

Sigogi

Jikin buƙata

Martani

Kuskuren da wannan matsaya za ta iya maido wa

404 · 422 · 429