身份验证
请将 API 密钥作为 bearer 令牌发送。此端点在规范中未指明具体的权限，因此请为您的密钥赋予所需的最小权限，并通过检查响应来确认，而不是盲目假设。
您的组织 ID 应填在此处
此端点将 org_id 作为查询参数。不填则调用涵盖您的整个租户子树；发送该参数则将调用范围缩小到一个组织。
您的组织ID位于控制面板的API密钥屏幕上，就在密钥本身的旁边。这是您在每次调用时使用的相同ID。
免费试用
将尖括号中的内容替换为您自己的值，并将键占位符替换为您仪表板中的一个键。
curl -X GET https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/alerts \
-H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…"已登录？您仪表板中的 API 控制台会自动填入您真实的组织 ID 和您自己的密钥，并针对实时 API 运行请求，以便您查看实际的响应。 在 API 控制台中打开此端点
详细信息
docs/87. What the bell in the dashboard header reads. ⚖️ Owner ask 2026-08-26: *"maybe have an alerts bit somewhere like the other hosting platfroms do that has like an ! when something is open and then a list of them, like in other enterprise apps type of thing."* Unions seven sources: the customer's live **notices** (maintenance, DNS drift, a lost delegation, a paused posting run, a stranded card, a new PHP build, a certificate lapsing), an **expired or expiring stored card**, a **past-due subscription**, **domains** expiring without auto-renew or already lapsed, **suspended / restricted / quarantined** sites and orgs, any **supplier** we depend on reporting degraded or out, **our own** published open incidents and announced windows, and sites with **malware** on them. ⛔ The last two are each deliberately distinct from the one before it. `incidents` is not `upstream` — that reports a *supplier* being unwell, this reports **Zinn®**, and a customer whose site is slow wants the second far more. `security` is not the suspended/restricted/quarantined family — those are *enforcement outcomes* and the site is already off, where an infected site inside its grace window is still serving and the customer can still act. A site that is both appears in both, and that is deliberate: the second alert is the reason for the first. ⛔ No permission key — being told your card has expired is not a privilege. Gating it would mean a member whose role lacks `org.read` silently never learns their sites are suspended. ⛔⛔ **This shipped in the same change that stopped platform notices bannering on every page.** Landing that alone would have made maintenance *unreachable* from `/sites` rather than merely quieter — a false all-clear with nothing red (§2.44). A banner policy without a bell is not a smaller feature, it is a worse one. ⛔ The header calls this on every page, so it is seven bounded queries against indexed columns and reaches no vendor (§2.16). Every count that could be per-site is a grouped aggregate returning ONE row, so an estate with 40,000 suspended or infected sites produces one alert saying so rather than 40,000.
参数
| 名称 | 类型 | 必填 | 内容简介 |
|---|---|---|---|
org_id (query) | string | 否 | Narrow to one organization. Omitted, the caller's whole accessible subtree is considered. An id outside that scope narrows to nothing rather than 403-ing. |
响应
| 名称 | 类型 | 必填 | 内容简介 |
|---|---|---|---|
data | Alert[] | 是 | — |
unread_action_count | integer | 是 | The badge. Unread `critical` + `action` items only. ⛔ Computed server-side rather than by counting `data` in the client — a second copy of "which severities count" is a copy tha… |
degraded | string[] | 是 | ⛔⛔ **Non-empty means the list above is INCOMPLETE.** Alert providers that raised, by name. A failing provider contributes nothing, and nothing is the reassuring value — without… |
此端点可能返回的错误
401 · 429