GET /v1/sites/{siteId}/collaborators

身份验证

请将 API 密钥作为 bearer 令牌发送。此端点在规范中未指明具体的权限，因此请为您的密钥赋予所需的最小权限，并通过检查响应来确认，而不是盲目假设。

此端点不需要组织 ID。您的密钥已用于识别其所属的组织，且响应范围也仅限于该组织。

免费试用

将尖括号中的内容替换为您自己的值，并将键占位符替换为您仪表板中的一个键。

curl -X GET https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/sites/{siteId}/collaborators \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…"

已登录？您仪表板中的 API 控制台会自动填入您真实的组织 ID 和您自己的密钥，并针对实时 API 运行请求，以便您查看实际的响应。 在 API 控制台中打开此端点

详细信息

Per-site collaborators — one person's access to ONE site, rather than to the whole organisation. Every grant on this site, newest first, live and lapsed alike: a revoked grant is kept because *"who could reach this site in March"* is the question an incident asks, and a deleted row cannot answer it. ⛔ Read and write share the `sites.collaborators.manage` permission. The list is the access-control state of the site — who else is in it, at what level, and why — and that is an account owner's business rather than a developer's. Among the customer roles only `owner` holds the key; `dev` deliberately does not, because a developer who could grant site access could grant it to themselves on a site they were never given. A site outside the caller's scope, and a site they can see but may not administer, both answer `404`. Same code, two reasons: a `403` on the second would tell a developer that a collaborator list exists on their client's site, and a `403` on the first is an existence oracle.

参数

响应

此端点可能返回的错误

401 · 403 · 404 · 429