connections

POST /v1/connections/{provider}/{connectionId}/probe

Re-test a stored credential, one row per permission.

ټول connections پای ټکي

تصدیق‌هویت

یو API کی د بیئرر ټوکن (bearer token) په توګه ولیکئ. کی باید د connections.manage اجازه ولري؛ له دې اجازې پرته کی د 404 پرځای د 403 په واسطه رد کیږي.

دا پای نقطه د سازمان هېڅ آی ډي نه اخلي. ستاسو کیلي مخکې تر مخکې هغه سازمان په ګوته کوي چې پورې اړه لري، او ځواب ورته محدود دی.

هڅه وکړئ

د انګلیسي په زاوي پنسونو کې هرڅه د خپلو ارزښتونو سره بدل کړئ، او د کلي ځای لرونکی ستاسو د ډشبورډ د کلي سره.

curl -X POST https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/connections/{provider}/{connectionId}/probe \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{  }'

ننوتي یاست؟ ستاسو په ډشبورډ کې د API کنسول ستاسو د اصلي سازمان ID او ستاسو خپله کیلي ډکوي، او غوښتنه د ژوندی API په وړاندې پرمخ وړي ترڅو تاسو وکولی شئ اصلي ځواب وګورئ. دا پای ټکی (endpoint) د API په کنسول کې پرانیزئ

تفصیلات

Exercises every permission we need **against the provider** using the credential already stored for this connection, and returns one row per permission. This is the "retest" half of add-and-test: the customer's fix happens in their vendor's console — they tick the missing permission at Cloudflare — so there is nothing to re-paste and the stored credential is used. ⛔ It does not ask the credential to describe itself. A least-privilege token cannot enumerate its own permissions, which is how a token missing DNS edit entirely came to be displayed as "works, we will check on first use". Every check here is a real, well-formed call, and a write permission is proved by writing — a throwaway DNS record created and immediately deleted, or a zone setting written back to the value just read. Each row is `pass`, `fail` or **`unknown`**, and the third is not a nicety: `unknown` is the honest answer when we could not reach the question — no zone on the account yet, the vendor rate-limiting us, or a well-formed request refused on its content. ⛔ A client that renders `unknown` as a tick has reintroduced the defect this endpoint exists to remove. The result is stored against the connection with the time it was taken, and returned with `checked_at`. It is a **measurement, not a state** — the customer can revoke a permission at their vendor a second later and nothing here will know — so any surface showing it must show its age. Requires `connections.manage`.

پارامترونه

نومډولاړیندا څه شی دی
provider (path)ConnectionProviderهوThe third-party provider whose connections are addressed.
connectionId (path)UuidهوThe MCP connection's id.

د غوښتنې بدن

نومډولاړیندا څه شی دی
zone_hintstringنهThe domain to test the zone-scoped permissions against. Optional — see `ConnectTokenRequest.zone_hint`.

ځواب

نومډولاړیندا څه شی دی
credential_validbooleanهوA statement about the **credential**, not about the permissions. `false` means the provider rejected it outright, in which case the rows are not meaningful and the screen must s…
usablebooleanهوWhether we may store and use this credential: alive, with no **proved** absence of anything required. ⛔ Deliberately not "every row passed" — a brand-new account with no zone on…
checksPermissionCheck[]هوOne row per permission, in a stable catalogue order rather than the order the checks happened to finish in — a checklist whose rows reshuffle between two retests looks broken to…
missingstring[]هوRequired permissions the provider **proved** are absent. Not the unknowns.
unverifiedstring[]هوPermissions we could not determine either way. The honest amber set.
account_refstringهوThe account or zone the provider reported — discovered, never assumed.
detailstringهوAn overall explanation, used mainly for a rejected credential.
checked_atobjectهوWhen this was taken. ⛔ Never render the report without it: a checklist with no date on it is indistinguishable from a live one and will be read as live, when in fact the custome…

تېروتنې چې دا پای ټکی یې بیرته راګرځولی شي

401 · 403 · 404 · 422 · 429 · 503