POST /v1/sites/{siteId}/retry-provisioning

Ìfàṣẹ́pọ̀

Fi bọ́ọ̀lù (bearer token) ranṣẹ gẹ́gẹ́ bí kọ́kọ́rọ́ API. Kọ́kọ́rọ́ náà gbọ́dọ̀ ní ìyọ̀ǹda sites.view; a ó kọ̀ ọ́ silẹ pẹlu 403, kii ṣe 404, ti kọ́kọ́rọ́ náà kò bá ní i.

Ojú abánisọ̀rọ̀ yìí kò gba id ajọ kankan. Kọ́kọ́rọ́ rẹ ti mọ ajọ ti o jẹ ti e, a o si fèsì nipa rẹ̀.

Gbiyanju rẹ

Rọ́pọ̀ èyíkéyìí nínú àwọn àmì ìtọ́ka < > pẹ̀lú iye tirẹ̀, àti àmì ìdánimọ̀ bọ́tìnnì náà pẹ̀lú bọ́tìnnì kan láti inú dásibọ̀ọ̀dù rẹ.

curl -X POST https://api.zinndigital.com/v1/sites/{siteId}/retry-provisioning \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer zdk_live_…"

Ṣé o ti wọlé? Iwọ̀n api ní nú ìgbékalẹ̀ rẹ kún id àjọ gidi rẹ ati bọtini tirẹ, o si nṣiṣẹ ibeere na lòdì si api gidi ki o le rii esi gidi na. Ṣí ojú abáná yìí sílẹ̀ nínú kọnsólù API

Àwọn kúlẹ̀kúlẹ̀

Re-runs provisioning for a site whose build failed or never started. The transition failed -> provisioning has always been legal and the status enum's own comment says "retry or delete" — this is the door. Idempotent, and pressing it twice is a success. A site that is already provisioning answers 202 with restarted: false rather than a 409: a customer pressing a button twice has not made an error. Three independent mechanisms make that safe — the workflow id is derived from the site id, the start policy is ALLOW_DUPLICATE_FAILED_ONLY so a completed provision can never be re-run, and the status transition locks and re-reads the row. ⛔ Nothing here calls Temporal (§2.9). The status change and a site.created event commit in one transaction and the existing consumer starts the workflow, so a Temporal outage cannot leave the row half-moved. A site that is active, deleting or deleted is a 422 — a retry re-runs the build, and those are past it. Requires sites.view and hosting.deploy.manage.

Àwọn ìpìlẹ̀

Idahun

Awọn aṣiṣe ti ibudo ipari yii le da pada

401 · 403 · 404 · 422 · 429